Legal Opinion
Rodolf v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 1938No. 27943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Plaintiffs in error, as the judgment debtors, complain here of the action of the trial court in overruling their objections to the confirmation of sale of real estate under mortgage foreclosure.
It is urged that the sale price is grossly inadequate, and that the fact that a person who held a so-called commission as deputy sheriff acted as one of the appraisers of the property is evidence of unfairness and irregularity in the sale proceedings.
The cases of Duncan v. Eck, 65 Okla. 250, 166 P. 121; State ex rel. Com’rs of Land Office v. Wilson, 124 Okla. 236, 254 P. 968; State ex rel. Com’rs of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. HarrowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Duncan v. EckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Aldridge Hotel Co. v. MainardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Miller v. Gray Eagle Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Inman v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Baldwin v. MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- West v. JUSTICE EX REL. JUSTICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007