Newton v. State Of
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, Judge:
This is a matter in which the petitioner in error, hereafter referred to as the defendant, as he appeared in the trial court, was convicted of the crime of kidnapping. This matter was reconsidered on a petition for rehearing, in light of the amended statutes, as provided by the 1965 session of the State Legislature.
Defendant listed several assignments of error, but only one need be discussed in this opinion. The defendant complains that the trial court erred in permitting the testimony of one Frank Brent to be read into the record.
Frank Brent was the chief prosecution witness…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fitzsimmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by22 opinions
- Castro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Dilworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Lavicky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.