Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2015No. 2013-SC-000556-MRPublished

1Dissent

ABRAMSON, J„

DISSENTING: -

For the reasons stated herein, I respectfully and strongly dissent. While Detective Anderkin’s ’ testimony concerning the Child Abuse Task Force was arguably improper, the error was not palpable. In addition, the time has comé for this Court to reconsider its rigid stance on the admissibility of Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAÁS) testimony and to align itself with the overwhelming majority of our sister jurisdictions, which allow such testimony under circumstances explained more fully infra.

I. Kentucky’s Outdated Position On CSAAS Evidence is Ripe For…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API