United States v. Kensington Shipyard & Drydock Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the government’s action under Section 3678 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.Int. Rev.Code, § 3678, 1 to enforce the tax lien of the United States for over $2,000,000 against Kensington Shipyard and Drydock Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, and its parent company, Aerodynamic Research Corporation.
Aerodynamic, chartered as a non-business corporation of the District of Columbia, was actually a holding company for several business concerns, including Kensington. Federal tax liens against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. HeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. W. W. Boyd, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.