Lind v. Muder
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentFidel, Judge
I concur in the majority’s decision that the will of Edward Frank Muder fails to meet the requirements of A.R.S. § 14-2502 for acceptance as a formally executed will. I dissent from the majority’s decision that the will fails to qualify for holographic validity under A.R.S. § 14-2503.1
To explain my view, I want first to consider what this case is not:
1. It is not a case in which Mr. Muder took a blank, unlabeled, print-bare piece of paper, wrote on it “My wife, Retha F. Muder, all my earthly possessions,” signed it, and left it for the interpretation of a curious posterity.
2. Nor is it a case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Matter of Estate of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- In Re Estate of SchuhCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Succession of BurkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dean v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.