Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Schuh

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1074PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellants are proponents of an alleged holographic will of the decedent, dated January 6, 1964. Appellee is the proponent of a witnessed will executed in 1960 and admitted herein by the court to probate. Cora Schuh, the beneficiary of the 1960 will, was the first of the decedent’s seven wives. She was married to him from 1918 to 1925, at which time they were divorced. In 1960, several marriages later and when the decedent was single, he executed the witnessed will naming Cora Schuh as beneficiary. In 1962, he married Gladys .Schuh, mother of appellant Robert M. Bes-see, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of DurlewangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. In Re Estate of DaleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Estate of MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of MulkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of Estate of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Matter of Estate of MuderArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Estate of MulkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Matter of Estate of MuderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API