Hamilton v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
— Barbara Hamilton appeals the juvenile court’s order declaring her nine-year-old daughter J.F. to be a dependent child. Hamilton contends that the court erred in concluding that the counselor-patient privilege provided *721by RCW 18.19.180 does not apply in dependency proceedings, and by ordering the testimony of her counselors and the production of evidence from the clinic she attended. According to Hamilton, the State failed to produce sufficient admissible evidence to sustain a finding of dependency. The State correctly contends that the evidence was admissible under the subpoena exception to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FagaldeWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Davis v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. KnightenWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Welfare of KeyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Welfare of X.T.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Davis v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.