Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Sullivan
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1919No. Civ. No. 2647PublishedCited by 13 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. A. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in the sum of $2,613.30, entered in favor of plaintiffs for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the breach of defendants to deliver a cargo of wheat to plaintiffs at Seattle during the month of September, 1914. .
After negotiations between the parties looking to the purchase and sale of a quantity of wheat, the plaintiffs wrote to defendants two letters, which were as follows:
“Sept. Shipt.
“454 California St.
“San Francisco, Cal., June 26th, 1914. “Friday
“Received Jun 27, 1914. “Answered-
“Messrs. F. J. Sullivan & Co.,
“ 310…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Dannemiller v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Ellsworth v. KnowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Burton v. Nacogdoches Crate & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Boehmer Coal Co. v. Burton Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Meier v. Paul X. Smith Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co. v. ComynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Johnson v. BantaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.