Legal Opinion

Olena v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 5, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The motions for a nonsuit and directed verdict were properly denied. As will appear later, the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict if exploding oil was supplied by the defendant when below the statutory standard and the explosion caused the decedent’s death, barring her fault.

A witness who was present at the accident testified that an explosion of the contents of an oil can preceded flames which enveloped and fatally burned the decedent. There was evidence that the can contained oil bought at a store. The storekeeper testified to having a 300-gallon tank for storing kerosene and to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pizzo v. WiemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marchand v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  2. Bruce v. Capitol Motor Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Dube v. MelhornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Danielson v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Haselton v. MaserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API