Legal Opinion
Estey Corp. v. Matzke
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 6, 1976No. 76 C 2194PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KIRKLAND, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.
Plaintiff seeks to redress deprivation of Constitutional rights guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment. Jurisdiction is invoked under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1843(3) and (4).
The complaint alleges that defendant members of the Capital Development Board, acting under color of the Capital Development Board Act, Illinois Revised Statutes ch. 127, §§ 771 et seq., unlawfully awarded a contract to defendant Carroll Seating Company and so deprived…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ream v. HandleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Thomas A. McManigal v. Seymour SimonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. McLucasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Oak RidgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- Kendrick v. City Council of Augusta, Ga.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.