Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

We are asked in this appeal to decide if a trial court has the inherent power to modify its lawful sentence of imprisonment where the court did not specify whether the sentence was to run consecutively or concurrently to an undischarged term of imprisonment on an unrelated conviction. Because the record of the original sentencing proceeding in this case does not suggest that the judge intended to impose consecutive sentences, we conclude that CPL 430.10 precluded the alteration of defendant’s sentence.

In 1979, defendant killed an individual during an argument…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. SmocumNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. MinayaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Campbell v. PesceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Richardson v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. People v. BrinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API