Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
After judgment in favor of defendants in this case, the defendant American Potash & Chemical Corporation filed with the clerk its cost bill totaling $395.75; and defendants Pacific Coast Borax Company, United States Borax Company and Borax Consolidated, Limited, filed with the clerk its cost bill totaling $667.40.
The clerk taxed the costs of American Potash & Chemical Corporation at $237.75, after disallowing the sum of $158 representing the cost of a copy of the deposition of G. B. Burnham. The clerk disallowed the same item appearing in the cost bill of defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Branfoot v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
- Ryan v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- TIMES NEWS. LTD.(GR. BRIT.) v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.