Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Pennsylvania Securities Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Charles J. Crooks (Crooks), a pro se litigant, 1 petitions for review of an order from the Pennsylvania Securities Commission (Commission) which suspended his agent’s license pursuant to an order of the Court of Common Pleas of McKean County (common pleas court). We affirm.

Crooks is licensed by the Commission as a securities agent. On April 9, 1997, the Commission received an order from the trial court directing it to suspend Crooks’ license to deal in securities, pursuant to a section of the Domestic Relations Code (Code), 23 Pa. C.S. § 4355(a), (c)(1), which provides, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Denier v. State Board of Medicine, Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MFS, INC. v. DilazaroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Tri-State Transfer Co. v. Department of Environmental Protection Tinicum TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Steller v. Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Schwalm v. Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API