A. G. Spalding & Bros. v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for goods sold and delivered to the county. The defense was pajunent. The defendant had judgment and plaintiff has appealed on the single ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding that the account had been paid.
For several years the plaintiff had sold athletic equipment to the school districts of the county, these sales having been made by an agent of plaintiff named Wales. Payments were made by means of warrants drawn by the county superintendent of schools, approved by the county auditor, and cashed by the county treasurer. During the years of 1931 and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dana & Brother v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Ser-Vis v. Victor Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hart v. Northwestern Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Warshauer v. Bauer Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Enjay Chemical Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1974
- City of San Jose v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2024