Nabell v. City of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworti-i, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The first question that presents itself for consideration is whether or not the city, in operating this pubile school, was performing a governmental or a ministerial function; it being well settled that the city would not be liable in the performance of a governmental function. While the line of demarcation between these two functions is in some cases rather closely drawn, we think that in the instant case the city was engaged in the performance of a governmental function. The duty of educating its citizenry is one that devolves upon the State of Georgia as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Love v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Cornelisen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Mayor of Savannah v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Watson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Daszkiewicz v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Fulgoni v. JohnstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Hibbs v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.