Legal Opinion

Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement District

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1971No. 3958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINTYRE, Chief Justice.

Appellants are appealing from a judgment of the district court which authorizes Toltec Watershed Improvement District to enter upon lands of defendant-appellants for the purpose of carrying out foundation studies for a dam site.

The only question presented for our consideration is whether the Wyoming law for the creation of watershed improvement districts (§§ 41-354.1 through 41-354.26, W.S. 1957, 1971 Cum.Supp.) is constitutional. Appellants are contending this law is unconstitutional because it offends the “one man, one vote” concept of equal protection under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Abate v. MundtSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cobb v. City of MaldenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Curtis v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Toltec Watershed Improvement District v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API