Legal Opinion
United States v. Calvin Edward Pruden
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 23, 2005No. 04-1863PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Calvin Pruden appeals his conviction and sentence for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922. Pruden argues that a critical statement he made to law enforcement agents was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights, because it was given the day after he had been read those rights. He also argues that the District Court erred in requiring, as a condition of his supervised release, that he obtain mental health counseling at the discretion of his probation officer.
We find that Pruden effectively waived his Miranda rights. The Miranda inquiry here requires us to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- United States v. LessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Daniel VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Daryl Lonard Parker, A/K/A Daryl Lenard Parker, A/K/A Junior Parker, A/K/A Jr Parker, A/K/A Jr, Daryl Lonard ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Antonio D. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.