Legal Opinion

Kurtin v. Cating Rope Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence and breach of warranty action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated March 17,1982, which, upon plaintiff’s motion to vacate a 90-day notice to resume prosecution of the action served by defendants and defendants’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 (subd [b], par [3]), to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute, inter alia, denied defendants’ cross motion on condition that plaintiff serve and file a note of issue and statement of readiness within 15 days after service upon plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Miskiewicz v. Hartley Restaurant Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kurtin v. Cating Rope Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Kurtin v. Cating Rope Works, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyons v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API