Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1916No. 4045PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by the original defendant, being the principal in a scire facias case. The record is quite voluminous- — entirely too much so. The material questions are few. After the transcript reached this court motions galore were filed in this court. Accompanying them were affidavits and original documents not filed in the lower court. We think it unnecessary to -even state these matters.

This court issued a certiorari to the district clerk, requiring him to send up an additional transcript with a correct caption to this case, the minutes of the court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. State v. PostonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. State v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Kepley v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State v. AkeTexas Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Pizzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API