Legal Opinion

Lund v. Mangelson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1968No. 36727PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action for damages as a result of an accident which occurred at the Ben Franklin 5 and 10 Cent Store at 3457 South Eighty-fourth Street, Omaha, Nebraska. At the close of the evidence defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict. This was overruled and the case was submitted to the jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant thereafter filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. When this motion was overruled, defendant perfected an appeal to this court.

The incident occurred on October 8, 1965, when plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egenberger v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Weston Ex Rel. Weston v. Gold & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Gorman v. World Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Beck v. Ideal Super Markets of Nebraska, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sankey v. WilliamsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Long v. HackerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Richardson v. Ames Avenue Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beatty v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Havlicek v. DesaiNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API