Legal Opinion

United States v. Rogde

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 22, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Action by the United States against Peter J. Rogde, H. W. Kittredge and Fanny Pearson, as heirs and devisees of Alfred B. Kittredge, deceased, Thomas McKeon, Peter F. Thompson, William E. Baker, Plerman C. Freese, George W. Abbott, Francis Hyde, and Porter P. Peck.

1Opinion of the Court

EDEIOTT, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action in this court against the defendant Rogde, as principal, and his codefendants, as sureties, upon his official bond, for the purpose of recovering $10,000’ and interest by reason of the facts set forth in the complaint herein as follows:

“The United States of America, plaintiff herein, appearing by its duly authorized attorney, Robert P. Stewart, complains and alleges:

' “I. That this action is brought and instituted by and under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States.

“II. That the defendants Peter J. Rogde, Thomas McKeon,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Tribune Printing & Binding Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1913
  4. Bankers' Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. RY. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. United States v. GriswoldArizona Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Twentier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. City of Duluth v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Deal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Fitchner v. American Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API