Legal Opinion

Marriage of Cadena v. Fries

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2015No. DA 14-0455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat

¶1 Kevin John Fries (Fries) appeals from the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) of the Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County. We affirm, order that Cadena is entitled to reasonable attorney fees on appeal, and remand for determination of those fees.

ISSUES

¶2 We review the following issues:

1. Did the District Court err in its application of the law regarding division of Fries’pension?

2. Is either party entitled to attorney fees?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Brenda Cadena (Cadena) and Fries married on June 7,1980. The marriage was dissolved by an order of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MeaseMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Marriage of Rolfe v. RolfeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Johnson v. TindallMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Laudert v. Richland County Sheriff's DepartmentMontana Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bucy v. Edward Jones & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Marriage of BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Marriage of Harrison-SimmonsMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Marriage of SchmidtMontana Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API