Legal Opinion
Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Panther-Panco Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 18, 1944No. 1213PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff charges that' the defendant infringes its trade-mark, and also seeks damages for alleged unfair competition.
Findings of Fact
The plaintiff is a manufacturer of utility footwear as distinguished from fashion footwear. It manufactures felt boots, rubbers, galoshes, and boots and shoes for heavy outdoor work. The plaintiff’s trademarks are United States Trade-Mark Registration Nos. 36,471 and 356,086.
The design of the trade-mark is a solid red circle, and the mark itself is generally made of red rubber and inlaid in the soles of shoes, rubbers…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Allen B. Wrisley Co. v. Iowa Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Kaufman v. KaufmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Phil J. Johnson and Hugh H. Johnson, D.B.A. Johnson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Bulova Watch Co. v. StolzbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Panther-Panco Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.