Legal Opinion

Reisan v. Mott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Polk county, Mills, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a criminal prosecution of the plaintiff instituted by the defendant Mott, maliciously and without probable cause, as the plaintiff claims. The of-fence charged by the defendant’s complaint in the criminal proeeed*50ing was the disposal of mortgaged personal property contrary to the provisions of our penal statute upon that subject. For the purposes of the present opinion the following may be considered as facts occurring prior to the commencement of this action, and admitted or supported by the evidence in this case: The plaintiff had executed to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Friedell v. Blakely Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Moore v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. FontaineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Stetson Press, Inc. v. Bunsen Oil Burner Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API