Maddy v. Sulphur Springs & Western Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, C. J.
Suit by the appellee, against the appellant, upon a promissory note for thirty-six dollars, averred in the complaint to have been made by the appellant, payable to the appellee, by the name of “H. Minesinger, Tr. S. S. & W. Tp. Co.” A copy of the note was filed with the complaint as part thereof.
The note was dated November 23d, 1869.
A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and exception taken.
Answer as follows:
“The defendant says that the note sued on was-exe*149cuted for an assessment upon the defendant’s lands for the construction of the turnpike road of the plaintiff, under and hy virtue of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Hopkins v. Greensburg, Knightstown, & Clarksburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marion & Monroe Gravel Road Co. v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Williams v. Pendleton & Fishersburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881