Legal Opinion

Maddy v. Sulphur Springs & Western Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, C. J.

Suit by the appellee, against the appellant, upon a promissory note for thirty-six dollars, averred in the complaint to have been made by the appellant, payable to the appellee, by the name of “H. Minesinger, Tr. S. S. & W. Tp. Co.” A copy of the note was filed with the complaint as part thereof.

The note was dated November 23d, 1869.

A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and exception taken.

Answer as follows:

“The defendant says that the note sued on was-exe*149cuted for an assessment upon the defendant’s lands for the construction of the turnpike road of the plaintiff, under and hy virtue of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hopkins v. Greensburg, Knightstown, & Clarksburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marion & Monroe Gravel Road Co. v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Williams v. Pendleton & Fishersburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API