Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pendleton & Fishersburg Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8198PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a suit by the appellee against George Parsons and Hervey Craven, upon a note given by them to the appellee in payment of a turnpike assessment against Parsons. Pending the suit Parsons died and the appellant, as his administrator, was put in his place. There was an answer in six paragraphs, viz.:

1st. Want of consideration;

2d. A set-off of $300 for work and labor by Parsons for the appellee;

3d. That the note was obtained by the appellee by false and fraudulent representations •,

4th. That the note was given for a turnpike assessment which did not include all the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hawley v. State ex rel. FiskIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Maddy v. Sulphur Springs & Western Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Parsons v. Pendleton & Fishersburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Dougherty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Brehm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Davis v. Liberty & Camden Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API