Legal Opinion

McCreedy v. City of Fort Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1923No. 24,905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion- of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy involves a construction of section 1233 of the General Statutes of 1915 with reference to the sufficiency of a protest against a paving improvement in a city of the first class of less than 25,000 population.

*754It was alleged in plaintiffs’ petition that the action was brought by plaintiffs, for themselves and on behalf of about eighty-five other resident citizens owning property on 6th street in the paving district; that the city of Fort Scott is a city of the first class having a population of about 12,000; that on.June 27,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Little v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Dunsworth v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barrett v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Iola Building & Loan Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. State Highway Commission v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. State ex rel. Mellott v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API