Legal Opinion

LINDER BY AND THROUGH LINDER v. Howard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1988No. 88-75PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing appellant Jennifer Linder’s suit on the grounds that it was barred by the statute of limitations. Linder contends that the court erred in dismissing her claim because the case had been transferred from chancery court where it had been inadvertently but timely filed. The appellees, Dan Howard and Travis Howard, respond that the trial court was correct in dismissing the suit and also request that we affirm in light of Linder’s failure to adhere to the proscriptions of Rule 9 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Meeks v. Arkansas Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Erwin, Inc. v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Phillips v. CattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rettig v. BallardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Scollard v. ScollardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Mark Barner v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Jones v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Scott White and Jamie White v. Hunter Owen and John Does 1-3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API