Phillips v. Catts
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellee had judgment against appellant by w'hich he recovered a royalty or commission alleged to have been earned by appellee in finding for appellant a lessee of a miming property. At first appellee filed his bill on the equity side of the court seeking an accounting of, royalties earned to his credit, but this court in Phillips v. Catts, 206 Ala. 594, 91 So. 579, held that appellee had an adequate remedy at law, whex-eupon, on appellee’s motion under the statute (Code, § 6486), the cause was transferred to the law side of the coxxrt, to which, as the court here held, “the same should have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zadek v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Phillips v. CattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Prestridge v. Patrick Irwin & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- LINDER BY AND THROUGH LINDER v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- LINDER BY AND THROUGH LINDER v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- LINDER BY AND THROUGH LINDER v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988