Legal Opinion

Sepmeyer v. Holman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. 75904PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

The issue in this appeal is whether the legislature may revive a time-barred tort claim brought by a crime victim against the victim’s offender based on conduct for which the offender was convicted. Plaintiff in the tort action is Elmer Sepmeyer, as special administrator for the estate of Esther Sepmeyer. The primary defendant is Richard Holman, who was convicted of murdering Esther Sepmeyer. Also named as defendants are the Illinois Department of Corrections, Comptroller and Central Management Services. These secondary defendants were named by plaintiff because they control the distribution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hupp v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Board of Education v. BlodgettIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Arnold Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Yusaf Asad MADYUN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gayle M. FRANZEN, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Golla v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County CollectorIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. John Doe A. v. Diocese of DallasIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API