Legal Opinion

Kellum v. THORNEYCROFT, ETC.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 27, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The appellant, an automobile salesman, had his driver’s license suspended for six months because of his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test. Upon receiving notice of the suspension, he requested an administrative hearing pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-691(E). The hearing officer of the Department of Transportation found that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe the appellant was driving while under the influence, was placed under arrest and refused to submit to the test. The suspension of his license was sustained and he appealed to the superior court.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Edwards v. Alhambra Elementary School District 63Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Murphy v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Murray v. Thorneycroft ex rel. Arizona Highway Department Motor Vehicle DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BlankAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BlankAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API