Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blank

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2004No. S-9721Published

1DissentMatthews, Justice

I disagree with one aspect of today’s opinion. Instead of remanding so that the superior court may decide in the first instance whether exigent circumstances are inherently present where there is a breathalyzer test under AS 28.35.031(g) based on probable cause that the person tested has committed a crime and that the test will produce relevant evidence (and if not whether exigent circumstances existed under the particular facts of this case), I think this court should decide the question now. The homicide in this ease occurred more than nine years ago, and further delay should be avoided, if…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Aliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. State v. Chase Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API