Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1964No. [App. No. 49, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons assigned by Judge Jones in the court below. On one point, however, we think it well to file a caveat. In disposing of the applicant’s contention that his confession was improperly admitted, Judge Jones correctly found that there was sufficient evidence that it was voluntary. But she also stated that the point could not be raised in a post conviction proceeding, citing Cheeseboro v. Warden, 224 Md. 660, 662, and Whitley v. Warden, 222 Md. 608. The statement may be inaccurate or misleading in view…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyde v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Whitley v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Simon v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. Nationwide Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Dailey v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Jackson v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Jordan v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API