State v. Campbell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
The State concedes that defendant James Bryan Campbell must receive a new trial on all charges because the trial court refused to allow both of his defense attorneys to argue during the final closing argument. N.C.G.S. § 84-14 (1985); State v. Mitchell, 321 N.C. 650, 365 S.E.2d 554 (1988). This opinion will therefore be limited to that issue and one other: whether to apply the continuous transaction doctrine to murder-arson cases.
I
Defendant was indicted by a Graham County grand jury on 12 June 1989 for first-degree murder and assorted other crimes stemming from a one-day crime…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. PakulskiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. KyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. RoseboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.