Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1992No. 268A90PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The State concedes that defendant James Bryan Campbell must receive a new trial on all charges because the trial court refused to allow both of his defense attorneys to argue during the final closing argument. N.C.G.S. § 84-14 (1985); State v. Mitchell, 321 N.C. 650, 365 S.E.2d 554 (1988). This opinion will therefore be limited to that issue and one other: whether to apply the continuous transaction doctrine to murder-arson cases.

I

Defendant was indicted by a Graham County grand jury on 12 June 1989 for first-degree murder and assorted other crimes stemming from a one-day crime…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. PakulskiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. KyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. RoseboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API