Legal Opinion

Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Brown

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1936No. File No. 7924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER 'CURIAM.

This cause is now before us on the motion of plaintiff-respondent Union Bond & Mortgage Company to dismiss the appeal insofar as it purports to 'be an appeal from the order denying the motion for new trial below. The appeal has been previously dismissed to that extent as to defendant-respondent H. P. Brown upon his motion (same title (1936) 64 S. D. 600, 266 N. \Y. 720) upon the ground that the said PI. P. Brown was an adverse party under the statute and a necessary party to the appeal, and that he was not served with notice of intention to1 move for new trial, nor with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucey v. VilhauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sutton v. Consolidated Apex Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fergen v. LonieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Sholseth v. Independent School Dist. of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Millard v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lyndoe v. Am. Standard Ins. Co. of WisconsinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lyndoe v. Am. Standard Ins. Co. of WisconsinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API