Fergen v. Lonie
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
This cause is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the' superintendent of banks from an *329order denying his motion to vacate a judgment taken against him as garnishee. ,
One ground of the motion is that the superintendent did not supply an undertaking on appeal. Such undertaking was not necessary. The superintendent of banks is a state officer, and the appeal was taken by him in a purely official capacity. Rev. Code 1919, § 3161.
The only other ground of the motion worthy of mention is that the notice of appeal was not served on the principal defendant. Under section 3146, Rev.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sutton v. Consolidated Apex Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Crouch v. Dakota, W. & M. R. R.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Powell v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morrell Livestock Co. v. Stockman's Commission Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Lucey v. VilhauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Reese TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.