Legal Opinion

Fergen v. Lonie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1926No. File No. 6270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

This cause is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the' superintendent of banks from an *329order denying his motion to vacate a judgment taken against him as garnishee. ,

One ground of the motion is that the superintendent did not supply an undertaking on appeal. Such undertaking was not necessary. The superintendent of banks is a state officer, and the appeal was taken by him in a purely official capacity. Rev. Code 1919, § 3161.

The only other ground of the motion worthy of mention is that the notice of appeal was not served on the principal defendant. Under section 3146, Rev.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Consolidated Apex Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Crouch v. Dakota, W. & M. R. R.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Powell v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morrell Livestock Co. v. Stockman's Commission Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lucey v. VilhauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re Reese TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API