Legal Opinion

United States v. Carrie Hamilton, Richard Miles, and Alice Miles

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-20616PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants-Appellants Carrie Hamilton, Richard Miles, and Alice Miles (the “Appellants”) appeal their sentences, arguing the district court erred in calculating their sentences by erroneously relying upon the mandate rule on remand and by violating United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.

I

Four defendants, Carrie Hamilton, Richard Miles, Alice Miles, and Harold Miles, were charged in a 32-count indictment with crimes related to their involvement in a Medicare fraud scheme, surrounding the creation and management of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. OgbaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Louis Perez v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. ElizondoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Arun SharmaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API