Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2010No. 09-35756PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Concurrence by Judge MOSMAN.
ORDER
The opinion filed July 28, 2010, and published at 613 F.3d 960 (9th Cir.2010), is amended as follows:
On 613 F.3d at 968, immediately below line 21, before section heading “B. Preliminary Injunction,” add new paragraph:
To the extent prior cases applying the “serious questions” test have held that a preliminary injunction may issue where the plaintiff shows only that serious questions going to the merits were raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in the plaintiffs favor, without satisfying the other two prongs,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- D.R. Ex Rel. Courtney R. v. Antelope Valley Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- WETZEL'S PRETZELS, LLC v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.