Legal Opinion

Pilot v. Hill

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2019No. Case No. 20180523PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 "Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day." Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance , ESSAYS: FIRST SERIES (1841), https://emersoncentral.com/texts/essays-first-series/self-reliance/ (last visited Feb. 15, 2019). Embracing this contrary spirit, the petitioner in this case, Robert Pilot, applies this attitude to the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. In 2011, these rules were amended in large part to facilitate access to justice and promote…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hill v. Estate of AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Keller v. Southwood North Medical Pavilion, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Judge v. Saltz Plastic Surgery, P.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Pilot v. HillCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berger v. Ogden Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. Diderickson and BruunUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Win-Win v. DutsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API