Board of Supervisors v. Paxton
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the decision of Hon. IT. M. YotjNG-, Chancellor of the Eleventh District, dissolving an injunction. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. 1. An injunction should be continued to the hearing, when its dissolution before that time will work irreparable injury by rendering the relief sought unavailing. Hill, on Inj., p. 103, sect. 35, p. 108, sect. 39, p. 110, sect. 41; McOorkle v. Brun, 76 N. C. 407; Owen v. Brien, 2 Tenn.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the decision of Hon. IT. M. YotjNG-, Chancellor of the Eleventh District, dissolving an injunction. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. 1. An injunction should be continued to the hearing, when its dissolution before that time will work irreparable injury by rendering the relief sought unavailing. Hill, on Inj., p. 103, sect. 35, p. 108, sect. 39, p. 110, sect. 41; McOorkle v. Brun, 76 N. C. 407; Owen v. Brien, 2 Tenn. Ch. 295 ; Murry v. Piston, 23 N. J. Eq. 127 ; Bowen v. Hoslcins, 45 Miss. 189 ; Attorney-General v. Oakland, Walk. Ch. (Mich.) 92 ; Hoag-land v. Titus,…
1Opinion of the CourtChalmers, J.
The allegations of the bill show that the bonds wrere void in the hands of a holder with notice of the violations of law committed in their issuance, but were valid and obligatory in the hands of a purchaser for value without notice. The bill alleged that the defendant had full notice and actual knowledge of the facts connected with their issuance, at and before *681bis acquisition of them. It therefore prayed that he might be compelled to surrender them, and that, pending the litigation, he might be enjoined from selling or transferring them. The answer denied the equities of the bill, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hibernian Bank v. EvermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Tush-ho-yo-tubby v. BarrMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hentz v. Delta BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1898