Legal Opinion

Tush-ho-yo-tubby v. Barr

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ebeob to the circuit court of Chickasaw county. Bbad-BOBD, J. The facts appear in the opinion of the court. The counsel on both sides filed lengthy written arguments, too long for insertion, and too complete and elaborate for any successful attempt at abbreviation by the reporter, therefore they are omitted.

1Opinion of the Court

Peyton, C. J.:

This was an action of ejectment, brought by Tush-ho-yo-tubby to the November term, 1858, of the circuit court of Chickasaw county, against Jacob Barr, to recover the possession of one hundred and sixty acres of land situated in said county.

The declaration alleges, that the plaintiff’s right to the possession accrued on the 6th day of February, 1836, by virtue of a located reservation secured to him by the treaty of the United States with the Chickasaw Indians, of whom he was one; and that, in the year 1838, he left the said land unoccupied, and has been ever since beyond the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchel and Others v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Green v. LiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  3. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Barr v. Gratz's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geeen v. MizelleMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Board of Supervisors v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Gibson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API