Legal Opinion
Powell v. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 14, 1998No. C2-97-380PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant David W. Alexander for an order imposing sanctions against plaintiffs counsel, Bernard Mazer, pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, Mary Anne Prescott Powell, is a beneficiary of two testamentary trusts administered by defendant Huntington Trust Company, N.A. (“Huntington”). Powell and Huntington have been involved in litigation in the courts of the state of Ohio arising out of Huntington’s decision to invest trust assets in a commercial property in Columbus, Ohio. Mazer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Invst Financial Group, Inc. v. Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Val-Land Farms, Inc. v. Third National Bank in KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Nagle Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Barnes v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Giganti v. Gen-X Strategies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Goldschmidt v. Paley Rothman Goldstein Rosenberg & Cooper, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.