Legal Opinion
United States v. Shawn Crawford
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 27, 2013No. 11-5394, 11-5544PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Marbley, D.J.,
KETHLEDGE, J. (pp. 556-57), delivered a separate opinion concurring in all but part II.B of the majority’s opinion and concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
In unrelated child pornography convictions, both James Gamble and Shawn Crawford were ordered by their respective district courts to pay over $1,000,000 in restitution to “Vicky,” the pseudonym of one of the individuals depicted in the images they possessed or received. Restitution was ordered jointly and severally under 18 U.S.C. § 2259, which makes restitution mandatory for “the full amount of the victim’s losses” in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Richard ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Jonathon SainzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Rufus RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.