Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Jonathon Sainz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 2016No. 13-3585PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Jonathon M. Sainz appeals from his sentence for transporting and possessing child pornography. Sainz presents two arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the district court ordered him to pay too much restitution to one victim of his possession crime. Second, he argues that the district court erred by imposing three special conditions of supervised release. We affirm the restitution order, but we order a limited remand to correct some issues of vagueness and overbreadth in the conditions of supervised release.

I. Restitution Order

By pleading guilty, Sainz…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Shawn SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Mario Ahlazshuna DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Michael AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Carey RayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Carl MooseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API