Legal Opinion

Gripp v. Lit Brothers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 94 and 95PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the lower court to grant defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial after a jury verdict for the plaintiffs, husband and wife, in a trespass action brought for personal injuries suffered by the wife when she fell in defendant’s department store.

■In accordance with the familiar rule, the verdict» having been rendered for plaintiffs, the evidence and thé inferences reasonably deducible therefrom are to be reviewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs.-

When thus viewed the evidence shows that while the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cronmuller v. Evening TelegraphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Cardone v. Sheldon Hotel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Loney Et Ux. v. DenenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Balaska v. National Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Eric Munzenmayer and Kathryn Munzenmayer, His Wife v. Lit Brothers, Inc., City Stores Company, Lit Brothers Division of City Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Spoltore v. Gilbert, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API