Balaska v. National Tea Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
KNOX, District Judge.
The wife-plaintiff, Mrs. Mary Balaska, slipped upon liquid detergent in the aisle of defendant’s store. Shortly before the fall of the wife-plaintiff, another fall had occurred in the same place and defendant had attempted to clean the aisle. The defense offered no testimony and presented no evidence at all to contradict plaintiff’s liability witnesses, *148all of which testimony was consistent with defendant’s liability. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant; whereupon the plaintiff then moved for judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Magee v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Samuel B. Peters v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Michele Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Cardone v. Sheldon Hotel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Livergood v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1995
- VIRGIN ISLANDS MARITIME SERVICE, INC. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping AuthorityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Sochanski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979