Litwinowicz v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs and third-party defendant have stipulated the narrow question before us: “Does interest run from entry of judgment following trial, or from the date of disposition of post-trial motions?” While plaintiffs’ judgments were against defendant, and not against the third-party defendant, counsel stipulated during argument that the question should be decided as if plaintiffs’ judgments were directly against the third-party defendant.
Plaintiffs, longshoremen, instituted separate actions against Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company to recover damages for personal injuries…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- United States v. VerdierSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Rose Powers, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Edward J. Powers, Deceased v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Harris v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez-Arzuaga, Appeal of Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Duvernay v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.