Legal Opinion

Litwinowicz v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1960No. Civ. A. 21553, 21554PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and third-party defendant have stipulated the narrow question before us: “Does interest run from entry of judgment following trial, or from the date of disposition of post-trial motions?” While plaintiffs’ judgments were against defendant, and not against the third-party defendant, counsel stipulated during argument that the question should be decided as if plaintiffs’ judgments were directly against the third-party defendant.

Plaintiffs, longshoremen, instituted separate actions against Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company to recover damages for personal injuries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. VerdierSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Rose Powers, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Edward J. Powers, Deceased v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Harris v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez-Arzuaga, Appeal of Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Duvernay v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API