Legal Opinion
Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 31, 1967No. Claim No. 44851PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry W. Lengyel, J.
This is a claim filed pursuant to section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law to recover payments which the claimant became obligated to pay to the Vocational Rehabilitation Fund and to the Fund for Reopened Cases, *409pursuant to subdivision 9 of section 15 and subdivision 3 of section 25 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was the workmen’s compensation carrier for Frank Tartaglia, Inc.
One, Michael Mahan, an employee of the claimant’s assured, died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident occurring on August 23,1961. His administratrix instituted an action for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. George Colon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Gould v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
- Nephew v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hayes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Tyler v. Eastern Discount Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968