Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Houston
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2004No. 02-CT-1011, 02-CT-1097PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, the District of Columbia challenges a decision by the trial court to grant appellee’s motion under Super. Ct.Crim. R. 118 to seal the record of his arrest for disorderly conduct. The District makes three arguments. First, it contends that the trial court mistakenly ordered the United States Attorney’s Office to respond to appellee’s motion, and that consequently the District did not learn of the court’s order directing a response until the deadline for responding had passed. Second, the District maintains that the court erred in treating…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia v. HudsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dada v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- United States v. BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re J.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sepulveda-Hambor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re JSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011