Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider this Court’s Order of February 4, 1991, granting Defendant Citation Oil & Gas Corporation’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims of unjust enrichment and public nuisance pursuant to Local Court Rule 14(A). Plaintiffs are correct that because service of Citation’s motion was by mail, they had until February 4, 1991, in which to respond to the motion pursuant to Local Court Rule 11 and F.R.Civ.P. 6(e). Accordingly, the Court’s Order of February 4, 1991, is vacated and the Court now considers Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Olwell v. Nye & Nissen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- McBride v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Booker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.